![]() ![]() ![]() Paganetti needed to have it ready for the coaches when their game planning began, which usually meant either early in the week or even in the week prior to the game to give coaches enough time to install corresponding strategies into their game plan. The timing of communicating that data-based information was crucial. It really could be anything that comes up that could be pertinent to that particular week and that is something that I really enjoyed,” Paganetti said. “It really was on a week-to-week basis with some of the game planning stuff. The result of that research could be anything that benefited the team’s approach for that specific game. Paganetti would analyze the data pertaining to an upcoming opponent to find any sort of statistical tendencies or notable trends that could be exploited. His in-season work largely involved using analytics to help with game planning. ![]() All of those in-game charts in Philadelphia were finalized before the season according to Paganetti, but could be altered slightly depending on the Eagles’ opponent. when to use timeouts versus when to let the clock run), when a play is valuable enough to use a challenge on and when to accept penalties. “The way the NFL works, when one team wins the Super Bowl, the other 31 teams spend the offseason trying to find ideas to copy from that team,” Paganetti said.Īnother major area that data informs is in-game situations, which includes clock management (i.e. Fourth-down attempts and two-point conversion attempts league wide have skyrocketed to historic levels over the past few seasons. ![]() Paganetti believes that partly because of the Eagles’ Super Bowl success, other teams around the league have adopted aggressive tendencies based on analytics. but he wanted to know the information and be able to digest the information and make the best decision for the football team,” Paganetti said. Ultimately, it was going to be his decision. “I think that was a good example of Doug’s receptiveness. The Eagles also led the league in two-point conversion attempts in both 20. The Eagles ranked either first or second in the league in fourth-down attempts all five years under Pederson. The Eagles’ use of data started with being more aggressive in specific situations – fourth downs and two-point conversions – which tracks with the league-wide adoption of analytic strategies.Īccording to a study done by Football Outsiders, an analytics community favorite, Pederson was the most aggressive head coach in NFL history during his time in Philadelphia. He was retained when Doug Pederson was hired and built a great relationship with the aggressive and analytically-minded head coach. Paganetti was hired by the Eagles in 2015, which coincided with Chip Kelly’s last year there as head coach. Knowing that information without having to watch several hours’ worth of tape is extremely valuable. For example, the data may show that an opposing offense uses 11 personnel (one RB, one TE and three WRs) 50 percent of the time and favors running crossing routes and play action out of that formation. team tendencies) and how successful various plays were against those formations. Analytics also makes game planning more efficient, because the data can quickly show coaches how often an opposing offense or defense utilizes different plays and formations (i.e. EP provides a baseline for specific situations in games and EPA measures if a player or team performs better or worse in that situation than expected.īy utilizing those metrics and others, an NFL team can better-inform its decision making. For example, a three-yard gain on fourth-and-2 is not worth the same as a three-yard gain on fourth-and-7. It is generally accepted that EP and EPA tell us more about production than conventional yardage statistics because not all yardage is created equal. They measure the value of a play and can better-show how effective a player or team is overall and in certain situations. “Using things like win probability and expected points added to understand the magnitude of plays,” Paganetti said.Įxpected Points (EP) and Expected Points Added (EPA) are metrics widely-used today by NFL teams and members of the media. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |